4.5 Article

Genetic and Physiological Diversity in the Leaf Photosynthetic Capacity of Soybean

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 2731-2741

Publisher

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2016.02.0122

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics-based Technology for Agricultural Improvement) [SFC1002]
  2. Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency (RIPE) project
  3. John Mung Program of Kyoto University
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K18634] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Enhancement of leaf photosynthetic capacity can lead to greater biomass productivity in crop plants. Targets for improving leaf photosynthetic capacity in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], however, remain to be elucidated. The objective of this study was to identify the physiological and morphological factors underlying the diverse photosynthetic capacities of different soybean genotypes. Light-saturated CO2 assimilation rates ranged from 18.1 to 27.6. mol m(-2) s(-1) under controlled conditions among 34 genotypes. PI 594409 A (Line no. 13) and PI 603911 C (Line no. 14) showed extremely high photosynthetic rates. Line no. 14 consistently showed greater photosynthetic rates than other lines under field conditions and reached 34.8. mol m(-2) s(-1), which was 11% greater than that of a reference genotype, Tachinagaha. The analysis of the CO2 response curve of Line no. 14 showed greater CO2 fixation activity, represented by the maximum rates of carboxylation (Vc(max)) and electron transport (J(max)). The leaf ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) content of Line no. 14 tended to be higher than that of other lines, which is suggested to contribute to high CO2 fixation activity. We attribute the high photosynthetic capacity that was observed among soybean genotypes to high CO2 fixation activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available