4.3 Article

Relationship of Quality of Life, Resilience, and Associated Factors Among Nursing Faculty During COVID-19

Journal

NURSE EDUCATOR
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 17-22

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000926

Keywords

COVID-19; cross-sectional survey; nursing faculty; quality of life; resilience; workspace

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the relationship between quality of life, resilience, and associated factors among nursing faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results showed that resilience was the strongest predictor of quality of life, and those nursing faculty who were able to adapt to challenges had better quality of life. Evidence-based programs are needed to build resilience and improve working conditions for nursing faculty to enhance their quality of life.
Background The COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent social distancing guidelines greatly impacted the quality of life (QoL) of nursing faculty. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship of QoL, resilience, and associated factors among nursing faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods In April 2020, a cross-sectional, anonymous survey was conducted with nursing faculty in a public university in rural Appalachia (n = 52). Instruments included QoL, resilience scales, work-related, and demographic variables. Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple linear regression analyses were used to analyze data. A content analysis was used to analyze an open-ended question. Results Resilience was the strongest variable to predict each of the QoL domains. Nursing faculty who reported better QoL were those who were able to adapt to changes and challenges mandated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions Evidence-based programs to build resilience and improve nursing faculty working conditions and their QoL are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available