4.8 Article

Diversity and evolution of B-family DNA polymerases

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue 18, Pages 10142-10156

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa760

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Social Fund [09.3.3-LMT-K-712-01-0080]
  2. Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)
  3. l'Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE15-0005-01]
  4. Research Council of Lithuania
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-17-CE15-0005] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

B-family DNA polymerases (PolBs) represent the most common replicases. PolB enzymes that require RNA (or DNA) primed templates for DNA synthesis are found in all domains of life and many DNA viruses. Despite extensive research on PolBs, their origins and evolution remain enigmatic. Massive accumulation of new genomic and metagenomic data from diverse habitats as well as availability of new structural information prompted us to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the PolB sequences, structures, domain organizations, taxonomic distribution and co-occurrence in genomes. Based on phylogenetic analysis, we identified a new, widespread group of bacterial PolBs that are more closely related to the catalytically active N-terminal half of the eukaryotic PolEpsilon (PolEpsilonN) than to Escherichia coli Pol II. In Archaea, we characterized six new groups of PolBs. Two of them show close relationships with eukaryotic PolBs, the first one with PolEpsilonN, and the second one with PolAlpha, PolDelta and PolZeta. In addition, structure comparisons suggested common origin of the catalytically inactive C-terminal half of PolEpsilon (PolEpsilonC) and PolAlpha. Finally, in certain archaeal PolBs we discovered C-terminal Zn-binding domains closely related to those of PolAlpha and PolEpsilonC. Collectively, the obtained results allowed us to propose a scenario for the evolution of eukaryotic PolBs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available