4.6 Article

Placenta-mediated complications: Nucleosomes and free DNA concentrations differ depending on subtypes

Journal

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 3371-3380

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jth.15105

Keywords

cell-free DNA; hyper-coagulability; intrauterine growth restriction; nucleosomes; preeclampsia; pregnancy

Funding

  1. University Hospital of Nimes (NIMAO internal grant)
  2. University Hospital of Nimes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Placenta-mediated pregnancy complications generate short- and long-term adverse medical outcomes for both the mother and the fetus. Nucleosomes and free DNA (fDNA) have been described in patients suffering from a wide range of inflammatory conditions. Objective The objective of our study was to compare nucleosomes and fDNA circulating levels during pregnancy and particularly in women developing a placenta-mediated complication according to the subtype (preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction) (NCT 01736826). Patients/Methods A total of 115 women were prospectively included in the study across three groups: 30 healthy non-pregnant women, 50 with normal pregnancy, and 35 with a complicated pregnancy. Blood samples were taken up to every 4 weeks for several women with normal pregnancy and nucleosomes and fDNA were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction, respectively. Results We show that nucleosomes and fDNA concentrations significantly increase during normal pregnancy, with concentrations at delivery differing between the two groups. Interestingly, we show that concentrations differ according to the type of placenta-mediated complications, with higher levels in preeclampsia compared to intrauterine growth restriction. Conclusions These data suggest that nucleosomes and fDNA may be additional actors participating in placenta-mediated pregnancy complications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available