4.6 Article

Genotyping of Cerebrospinal Fluid Associated With Osimertinib Response and Resistance for Leptomeningeal Metastases in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 250-258

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.10.008

Keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid; Leptomeningeal metastases; Genotyping; Non-small cell lung cancer; Osimertinib

Funding

  1. Key Lab System Project of Guangdong Science and Technology DepartmentGuangdong Provincial Key Lab of Translational Medicine in Lung Cancer [2017B030314120]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation [81802298]
  3. High-Level Hospital Construction Project [DFJH201910]
  4. National Key RAMP
  5. D Program of China [2016YFC1303800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genotyping of cerebrospinal fluid can predict the efficacy of osimertinib treatment in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Different genetic alterations may affect treatment response and prognosis.
Introduction: Patients with NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) presented dismal prognosis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is suggested as a medium of liquid biopsy of LM. However, the clinical implications of CSF genotyping on treatment outcomes remained elusive. Methods: Patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC with LM were included: cohort 1, patients with LM who were treated with osimertinib with CSF and plasma genotyping performed before the first dosing of osimertinib (baseline, n = 45); cohort 2, CSF genotyping on progression on osimertinib and development of LM (the progression event on osimertinib is the diagnosis of LM, n = 35). Circulating tumor DNA in CSF underwent next-generation sequencing. Results: Sensitivity of CSF genotyping for EGFR-sensitizing mutations was 93.3% (42 of 45) and 97.1% (34 of 35) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. In cohort 1, patients with EGFR exon 19 deletion had higher median intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) than those with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation (11.9 versus 2.8 mo; p = 0.02). Median iPFS was significantly longer in patients with T790M-positive CSF genotyping (15.6 mo) than T790M-negative CSF (7.0 mo, p = 0.04). Concurrent CDK4 (2.8 versus 11.6 mo, p = 0.002) and CDKN2A (2.5 versus 9.6 mo, p = 0.04) mutation with EGFR-sensitizing mutations indicated lower median iPFS. Patients with T790M-negative CSF, EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, concurrent FGF3 alteration, and over first-line osimertinib had shortened iPFS. In cohort 2, possible EGFR-related and EGFR-independent resistance mechanisms were found including C797S mutation, MET dysregulation, and TP53 plus RB1 co-occurrence. Patients with loss of T790M in CSF had a shorter median iPFS (7.4 mo) compared with those with reserved T790M (13.6 mo, p = 0.01). Conclusions: Genotyping of CSF indicated heterogeneous response to osimertinib and revealed the genetic characteristic of LM on osimertinib failure in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC diagnosed with LM. (C) 2020 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available