4.1 Article

A kinetic proofreading model for bispecific protein degraders

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 149-163

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10928-020-09722-z

Keywords

Mechanistic modeling; Targeted protein degradation; Kinetic proofreading; Translational pharmacology

Funding

  1. Pfizer Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study describes a mechanistic modeling framework for bispecific protein degraders (BPDs) that involves ternary complex formation and degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system. A multi-step process in the model results in a time delay, balancing ternary complex stability and proteasome degradation rates. This concept applies kinetic proofreading in a quantitative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic framework to inform the design of potent and selective BPDs.
Bispecific protein degraders (BPDs) engage the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) to catalytically degrade intracellular proteins through the formation of ternary complexes with the target protein and E3 ubiquitin ligases. Here, we describe the development of a mechanistic modeling framework for BPDs that includes the reaction network governing ternary complex formation and degradation via the UPS. A critical element of the model framework is a multi-step process that results in a time delay between ternary complex formation and protein degradation, thereby balancing ternary complex stability against UPS degradation rates akin to the kinetic proofreading concept that has been proposed to explain the accuracy and specificity of biological processes including protein translation and T cell receptor signal transduction. Kinetic proofreading likely plays a central role in the cell's ability to regulate substrate recognition and degradation by the UPS, and the model presented here applies this concept in the context of a quantitative pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) framework to inform the design of potent and selective BPDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available