4.1 Article

The Development of the Australian National Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative Integrating Qualitative Research into Clinical Trials Framework

Journal

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 331-337

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0480

Keywords

mixed methods; qualitative research; randomized clinical trials; trial development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Qualitative research methods have significant contributions to health research, including improving understanding in new areas, questioning assumptions, understanding viewpoints of specific subgroups, and offering complex contextual information. There is a need to better recognize the role of qualitative research in clinical trial design and implementation, and to develop accessible approaches to integrate qualitative research for improving study outcomes.
Qualitative methodologies have multiple contributions to health research, including improving baseline understanding in new areas of enquiry; questioning existing assumptions; understanding viewpoints of specific subgroups; and offering complex, contextual information. While the role of qualitative research within mixed methods approaches is well documented, the contribution to clinical trial design and conduct is less well recognized. The Australian Palliative Care Clinical Studies Collaborative and Cancer Symptom Trials have developed a framework to detail how qualitative research might contribute to each key aspect of clinical trials. This practical framework provides real-world examples, including sample qualitative questions, to consider at each phase of controlled clinical trial development. As the number of randomized clinical trials in palliative care increases, a readily accessible approach to integrating qualitative research into clinical trial design and conduct is needed so that its full potential for improving study recruitment, conduct, outcomes, interpretation, and implementation may be realized.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available