4.4 Article

Biosynthesis of adipic acid in metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue 12, Pages 1065-1075

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGICAL SOCIETY KOREA
DOI: 10.1007/s12275-020-0261-7

Keywords

Saccharomyces cerevisiae; adipic acid; reverse adipate degradation pathway (RADP); metabolic engineering; fermentation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0905502]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21877053, 31601564]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20181345]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51705A]
  5. Open Foundation of Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology [KLIB-KF201807]
  6. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Provence [KYCX17_1424]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adipic Acid (AA) is a valued platform chemical compound, which can be used as a precursor of nylon-6,6. Due to the generation of an enormous amount of nitric oxide metabolites and the growing depletion of oil resources as a result of AA production from a mixture of cyclohexanol and cyclohexanone, the microbial methods for synthesizing AA have attracted significant attention. Of the several AA-producing pathways, the reverse adipate degradation pathway in Thermobifida fusca (Tfu RADP) is reported to be the most efficient, which has been confirmed in Escherichia coli. In this study, the heterologous Tfu RADP was constructed for producing AA in S. cerevisiae by co-expressing genes of Tfu_0875, Tfu_2399, Tfu_0067, Tfu_1647, Tfu_2576, and Tfu_2576. The AA titer combined with biomass, cofactors and other by-products was all determined after fermentation. During batch fermentation in a shake flask, the maximum AA titer was 3.83 mg/L, while the titer increased to 10.09 mg/L during fed-batch fermentation in a 5-L bioreactor after fermentation modification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available