4.7 Article

Solvents-dependent selective fabrication of face-centered cubic and hexagonal close-packed structured ruthenium nanoparticles during liquid-phase laser ablation

Journal

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
Volume 585, Issue -, Pages 452-458

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.10.026

Keywords

Ruthenium nanoparticles; Crystallographic structure; Metastable phase; Laser ablation in liquids

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51571186, 11674321, 11604320, 51971211, 51801205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study demonstrates a tunable fabrication strategy of fcc and hcp Ru NPs by laser ablation in different solvents. The choice of solvent and pulse energy can affect the crystallographic structure formation.
Ruthenium nanoparticles (Ru NPs) with face-centered cubic (fcc) structure possess higher catalytic activity than that with hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure. However, a high temperature above 1800 K is needed for the formation of the metastable fcc Ru phase. In this study, we present a tunable fabrication strategy of fcc and hcp Ru NPs by laser ablation of Ru target in solvents. In methanol, ethanol or acetone organic solvent, both fcc and hcp Ru NPs encapsulated in carbon layer could be obtained, while in deionized water only pure hcp Ru NPs formed. The extreme conditions, that is, the laser-target interaction induced high temperature and high-pressure plasma plume (4000-5000 K, 10-15 GPa) together with its subsequent quenching process, favored the formation of metastable fcc phase. Significantly, the graphite carbon layers sourced from the thermal decomposition of solvent molecules prevent the further evolution of metastable fcc phase into stable hcp phase. Clarification of the solvents and pulse energy effects promise the tunable fabrication of Ru NPs with desired crystallographic structure during laser ablation in liquids (LAL). (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available