Comparison of patient preferences for fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy using the analytic hierarchy process
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Comparison of patient preferences for fecal immunochemical test or colonoscopy using the analytic hierarchy process
Authors
Keywords
Colorectal cancer screening, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Patient preference, Colonoscopy, Fecal immunochemical test
Journal
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-04-22
DOI
10.1186/s12913-015-0841-0
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- (2013) Ann G. Zauber et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians
- (2013) Amir Qaseem ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Techniques and Intention to Attend: a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
- (2013) J. Marjan Hummel et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Aid-Assisted Decision Making and Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2012) Paul C. Schroy et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2012) Sandeep Vijan ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Patients’ Preferences and Priorities Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2012) James G. Dolan et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and screening test use in a large multispecialty primary care practice
- (2011) Sarah T. Hawley et al. CANCER
- Editorial: FIT: A Valuable but Underutilized Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer—It's Time for a Change
- (2010) James E Allison AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Informed Decision Making Changes Test Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Diverse Population
- (2010) N. K. Shokar et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- The cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer
- (2010) J. J. Telford et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Is Discussion of Colorectal Cancer Screening Options Associated with Heightened Patient Confusion?
- (2010) R. M. Jones et al. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
- Influence of seasonal variations in ambient temperatures on performance of immunochemical faecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: observational study from the Florence district
- (2010) G. Grazzini et al. GUT
- Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates
- (2009) Brenda K. Edwards et al. CANCER
- Uptake of faecal occult blood test colorectal cancer screening by different ethnic groups in the Netherlands
- (2009) M. Deutekom et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation
- (2009) Graeme P Young JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
- Colorectal cancer screening mode preferences among US veterans
- (2009) Adam A. Powell et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: Analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process
- (2008) Yuichi Katsumura et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- The public prefers fecal occult blood test over colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening
- (2008) Ronit Almog et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION
- Random Comparison of Guaiac and Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer in a Screening Population
- (2008) Leo G. van Rossum et al. GASTROENTEROLOGY
- Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Primary Care Patients
- (2008) Sarah T. Hawley et al. MEDICAL CARE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started