4.4 Article

Influence of cycling profile, depth of discharge and temperature on commercial LFP/C cell ageing: post-mortem material analysis of structure, morphology and chemical composition

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 50, Issue 11, Pages 1101-1117

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10800-020-01465-6

Keywords

Iron dissolution; Vanadium dissolution; Li-ion; Li-plating; LiF crystals; Degradation

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. Federal Ministry of Education and Research [03FH028IX4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents post-mortem analysis of commercial LiFePO(4)battery cells, which are aged at 55 degrees C and - 20 degrees C using dynamic current profiles and different depth of discharges (DOD). Post-mortem analysis focuses on the structure of the electrodes using atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the chemical composition changes using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The results show that ageing at lower DOD results in higher capacity fading compared to higher DOD cycling. The anode surface aged at 55 degrees C forms a dense cover on the graphite flakes, while at the anode surface aged at - 20 degrees C lithium plating and LiF crystals are observed. As expected, Fe dissolution from the cathode and deposition on the anode are observed for the ageing performed at 55 degrees C, while Fe dissolution and deposition are not observed at - 20 degrees C. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), the surface conductivity is examined, which shows only minor degradation for the cathodes aged at - 20 degrees C. The cathodes aged at 55 degrees C exhibit micrometer size agglomerates of nanometer particles on the cathode surface. The results indicate that cycling at higher SOC ranges is more detrimental and low temperature cycling mainly affects the anode by the formation of plated Li. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available