4.7 Article

Highways to hell: Mechanism-based management of cytokine storm syndromes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 146, Issue 5, Pages 949-959

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.09.016

Keywords

Cytokine storm; hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; macrophage activation syndrome; cytokine release syndrome

Funding

  1. RK Mellon Institute for Pediatric Research [R01 R01HD098428]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the first textbook devoted to cytokine storm syndromes (CSSs) was published in 2019, the world has changed dramatically and the term's visibility has broadened. Herein, we define CSSs broadly to include life/organ-threatening systemic inflammation and immunopathology regardless of the context in which it occurs, recognizing that the indistinct borders of such a definition limit its utility. Nevertheless, we are focused on the pathomechanisms leading to CSSs, including impairment of granule-mediated cytotoxicity, specific viral infections, excess IL-18, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. These mechanisms are often reflected in distinct clinical features, functional tests, and/or biomarker assessments. Moreover, these mechanisms often indicate specific, definitive treatments. This mechanism-focused organization is vital to both advancing the field and understanding the complexities in individual patients. However, increasing evidence suggests that these mechanisms interact and overlap. Likewise, the utility of a broad term such as cytokine storm'' is that it reflects a convergence on a systemic inflammatory phenotype that, regardless of cause or context, may be amenable to inflammo-stabilization.'' CSS research must improve our appreciation of its various mechanisms and their interactions and treatments, but it must also identify the signs and interventions that may broadly prevent CSS-induced immunopathology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available