4.7 Article

Autogenous and engineered healing mechanisms of carbonated steel slag aggregate in concrete

Journal

CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 191-202

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.191

Keywords

Carbonated steel slag; Aggregate; Concrete; Self-healing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund [51172098]
  2. Shandong Province Science and Technology Development Plan [2014GSF117017]
  3. National High-tech R&D Program (863 Program) [2015AA034701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The application of self-healing technology in concrete materials was widely investigated in the past decade. Although the micro-capsules and bacteria were considered as promising self-healing agents to realize durability enhancement of concrete, the high cost of micro-capsules and limited bacteria types are still big challenges that limit the widely application of this technology. As a result, it is necessary to develop cost-effective and environmentally friendly materials as self-healing agent in concrete. In this study, carbonated steel slag was used as aggregate to realize the autogenous healing of concrete. The self-healing performance of this concrete was investigated by comparing with the concretes prepared with normal aggregates and crushed steel slag aggregates. In addition, the hydration heat, X-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive spectroscopy results were analyzed to elucidate the self-healing mechanisms of concrete via using carbonated steel slag as healing agent. It was found that the healing products are mainly composed of CaCO3, Ca(OH)(2), calcium-silicate-hydrate, calcium-aluminate-ferrite hydrate as well as amorphous silica. The cracks of aggregate have been healed to a certain extent that maximum healing width is about 20 mu m and maximum healing length is about 5 mm. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available