4.2 Article

Degradation of Auramine-O in Aqueous Solution by Ti/PbO2-Electro-Fenton Process by Hydrogen Peroxide Produced In Situ

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40995-020-00975-4

Keywords

Ti; PbO(2)anode; Electro-Fenton; Auramine-O; H2O2; Mineralization; TOC

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576065, 21402038]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province of China [B2020202016, B2019202003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electrochemical removal of organic dye Auramine-O from contaminated solution using Ti/PbO(2) electrodes and carbon felt air-diffusion electrode, in situ generating H2O2, achieved a high removal efficiency. Comparing with other anodic oxidation processes, the Ti/PbO2-EF process was proven to be the best choice in terms of efficiency and effectiveness.
Electrochemical removal of synthesis solution containing 50 mg/L auramine-O through Ti/PbO(2)electrodes and carbon felt air-diffusion electrode to in situ generate hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by the oxygen (O-2) reduction. The effects of operating conditions, FeSO4 center dot 7H(2)O concentrations, current density, initial concentration, initial pH value and sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) concentration were investigated. For reaction of 60 min, the auramine-O removal rate reached 99% and total organic carbon (TOC) removal rate was close to 64.27%. This means that the organic macromolecules in the pollutants have been completely destroyed and broken down. The degradation of auramine-O under electro-Fenton (EF) process using Ti/PbO2-carbon felt was analyzed from the dimensions of TOC, mineralization current efficiency, energy consumption, degradation mechanism and kinetics. Comparing EF-Ti/PbO(2)with Ti/PbO(2)anode, AO (anodic oxidation)-Ti/PbO(2)anodic oxidation using Ti/PbO(2)anode and EF-Pt EF process with Pt anode, the consequences demonstrated that Ti/PbO2-EF process by hydrogen peroxide produced in situ was the best choice than others.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available