4.6 Article

Fine-resolution conservation planning with limited climate-change information

Journal

CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 278-289

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12793

Keywords

diversification; natural resource management; optimal reserve-site selection; portfolio optimization; uncertainty

Funding

  1. USDA-NIFA [ILLU-470-353, ILLU-470-323]
  2. USGS [G12AC20056]
  3. National Science Foundation (NSF) [1339944]
  4. Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Graduate University (OIST)
  5. USGS Climate and Land Use Change Research and Development Program
  6. USGS Ecosystem Program
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  8. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1339944] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate-change induced uncertainties in future spatial patterns of conservation-related outcomes make it difficult to implement standard conservation-planning paradigms. A recent study translates Markowitz's risk-diversification strategy from finance to conservation settings, enabling conservation agents to use this diversification strategy for allocating conservation and restoration investments across space to minimize the risk associated with such uncertainty. However, this method is information intensive and requires a large number of forecasts of ecological outcomes associated with possible climate-change scenarios for carrying out fine-resolution conservation planning. We developed a technique for iterative, spatial portfolio analysis that can be used to allocate scarce conservation resources across a desired level of subregions in a planning landscape in the absence of a sufficient number of ecological forecasts. We applied our technique to the Prairie Pothole Region in central North America. A lack of sufficient future climate information prevented attainment of the most efficient risk-return conservation outcomes in the Prairie Pothole Region. The difference in expected conservation returns between conservation planning with limited climate-change information and full climate-change information was as large as 30% for the Prairie Pothole Region even when the most efficient iterative approach was used. However, our iterative approach allowed finer resolution portfolio allocation with limited climate-change forecasts such that the best possible risk-return combinations were obtained. With our most efficient iterative approach, the expected loss in conservation outcomes owing to limited climate-change information could be reduced by 17% relative to other iterative approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available