4.7 Article

Identification of the Lineage Markers and Inhibition of DAB2 in In Vitro Fertilized Porcine Embryos

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197275

Keywords

pig; embryo; lineage markers; DAB2

Funding

  1. BK21 Plus Program
  2. Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries (IPET) through the Development of High Value-Added Food Technology Program - Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural A ffairs (MAFRA) [118042-03-1-HD020]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [NRF-2019R1C1C1004514]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Specification of embryonic lineages is an important question in the field of early development. Numerous studies analyzed the expression patterns of the candidate transcripts and proteins in humans and mice and clearly determined the markers of each lineage. To overcome the limitations of human and mouse embryos, the expression of the marker transcripts in each cell has been investigated using in vivo embryos in pigs. In vitro produced embryos are more accessible, can be rapidly processed with low cost. Therefore, we analyzed the characteristics of lineage markers and the effects of the DAB2 gene (trophectoderm marker) in in vitro fertilized porcine embryos. We investigated the expression levels of the marker genes during embryonic stages and distribution of the marker proteins was assayed in day 7 blastocysts. Then, the shRNA vectors were injected into the fertilized embryos and the differences in the marker transcripts were analyzed. Marker transcripts showed diverse patterns of expression, and each embryonic lineage could be identified with localization of marker proteins. In DAB2-shRNA vectors injected embryos, HNF4A and PDGFRA were upregulated. DAB2 protein level was lower in shRNA-injected embryos without significant differences. Our results will contribute to understanding of the mechanisms of embryonic lineage specification in pigs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available