4.4 Article

Point-of-care screening for syphilis and HIV in the borderlands: challenges in implementation in the Brazilian Amazon

Journal

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1155-y

Keywords

Syphilis; HIV; Point-of-care testing; Implementation; Amazon

Funding

  1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [47697]
  2. Foundation for Research Support of the Amazonas State (FAPEAM) through the Programa de Apoio a Nucelos de Excelencia (PRONEX)
  3. FAPEAM through the Strategic Programme in Science, Technology & Innovation in Health Foundations (PECTI/AM SAUDE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Point-of-care (POC) screening for HIV and syphilis using rapid testing was implemented in indigenous communities in the triple-border area of the Brazilian Amazon. We describe the context of the early introduction of POC screening, explore hindering and enabling factors for POC implementation, and recommend strategies for feasible, viable, and sustainable syphilis and HIV screening interventions. Methods: This was a qualitative study based on grounded theory methodology. Data were collected using in-depth interviews, semi-structured questionnaires, and field observations and were analysed using the framework approach. Qualitative information was complemented by quantitative data for descriptive purposes. Results: An overall high score for vulnerability to acquiring HIV and syphilis was observed among the indigenous communities. Health professionals reported satisfactory rapid testing acceptance, although concerns were raised about the pain of the fingerprick. Counselling-related challenges included ensuring the accuracy of translations, collaborating with translators and communicating positive test results. Over 3 months, 86.7 % of the syphilis-positive individuals began treatment, and all of them notified their partners. Accessibility, measured as travel time via the local transportation network, was a barrier to health care access. A lack of gasoline for boats and other transportation was also a hindering factor at all levels of implementation. Conclusions: The recommendations address the preparation phase at the coordination level as well as at the training level. Tools such as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analyses; checklists; context-adapted protocols; and fact sheets are very simple methods to facilitate implementation. The findings of this study are important because they may inform the implementation of new health technologies in low-resource national disease control programmes in remote communities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available