4.5 Article

Subtotal colectomy, extended right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, or splenic flexure colectomy for splenic flexure tumors: a network meta-analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 311-322

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03763-z

Keywords

Splenic flexure tumors; Network meta-analysis; Surgery; Postoperative complications; Overall survival

Funding

  1. National Clinical Key Specialty Construction Project (General Surgery) of China [2012-649]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81902378]
  3. Young Scientist Foundation of Fujian Provincial Commission of Health and Family Planning [2017-1-39]
  4. Startup Fund for Scientific Research, Fujian Medical University [2017XQ1028]
  5. Joint Funds for the innovation of science and Technology, Fujian province [2017Y9038, 2017Y9103, 2019Y9101]
  6. Fujian Science and Technology Project [2016 J01456]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The network meta-analysis evaluated the short-term and long-term outcomes of four different surgical techniques for splenic flexure tumors. The study found that SFC, LHC, ERHC, and STC provide similar survival rates, emphasizing the importance of individualized surgical plans considering both short-term and long-term outcomes.
Aim To perform a network meta-analysis of the current literature to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of four operations for splenic flexure tumors. Methods An electronic literature search of PubMed, Baidu Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed up to August 2020. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was utilized to compare the outcomes involved in subtotal colectomy (STC), extended right hemicolectomy (ERHC), standard left hemicolectomy (LHC), and splenic flexure colectomy (SFC) by using R software. Results A total of 10 non-randomized studies were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference among these 4 surgical techniques in terms of the utilization rate of minimally invasive surgery, reoperative surgery, anastomotic dehiscence, mortality, the proportion of patients with the number of lymph nodes harvested >= 12, local recurrence, distant recurrence and overall survival. Although ERHC was associated with a higher risk of postoperative ileus (ERHC vs SFC, OR = 6.4, 95% CI 1.4-45.0,P= 0.019), it has an advantage of a higher rate of primary anastomosis (ERHC vs LHC, OR = 4.2, 95% CI 1.3-18.0,P= 0.019) and a non-significant trend for lower anastomotic dehiscence when compared with more restrict resections. Conclusion SFC, LHC, ERHC and STC for the curative resection of splenic flexure tumors provide similar survival. An individualized surgical plan considering both long-term and short-term outcomes is necessary to select the appropriate operations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available