4.7 Article

Physicochemical characterization and self-assembly of human amniotic membrane and umbilical cord collagen: A comparative study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 2920-2933

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.10.107

Keywords

Amniotic membrane; Collagen; Umbilical cord; Fibrillogenesis; Triple Helicity

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology (DST)-Woman Scientist-A (WOS-A) scheme, Ministry of Science and Technology, India [SR/WOS-A/ET-108/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diverse application of collagen has created a need to discover renewable and economical sources with prevailing/improved physico-chemical properties. To address this scenario, the present study has extracted collagen from Human Amniotic Membrane (AM) and Umbilical cord, which are treated as medical waste and compared its physico-chemical properties. Collagen was extracted by pepsin solubilization using various salt concentrations (1 M, 2 M and 4 M). Umbilical Cord Collagen (UC) yield was 10% higher than Amniotic Membrane Collagen (AC). UC reported 58% higher sulphated glycosaminoglycan content than AC. Electrophoretic pattern of AC and UC in both disulphide bond reducing and non-reducing conditions showed bands corresponding to collagen type I, III, IV, V and XV. Collagen morphology was examined using SEM and the amino acid content was quantified by HPLC and LC-MS/MS. Triple helicity was confirmed by CD and FTIR spectra. Thermal transition temperature of AC and UC was found equivalent to animal collagen. Self-assembly, fibril morphology and spatial alignment was studied using AFM and DLS. Biocompatibility was analyzed using 3T3 fibroblast cells. In conclusion, UC with higher yield, presented with better physico-chemical, structural and biological properties than AC could serve as an efficient alternative to the existing animal collagen for diverse applications. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available