4.7 Article

Combination of high-pressure homogenization and ultrasound improves physiochemical, interfacial and gelation properties of whey protein isolate

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102450

Keywords

Whey protein isolate (WPI); High-pressure homogenization treatment (HPH); Ultrasonic treatment (US); Physiochemical; Interfacial and gelation properties

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0400605]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [C2017029]
  3. Key Program of Heilongjiang Province of China [2019ZX07B02-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main purpose of this work was to investigate the influence of high-pressure homogenization (HPH, 60, 90, and 120 MPa, three cycles) combined with ultrasound (US, 120, 360, and 600 W, 30 min) on the physiochemical, interfacial, and gelation properties of whey protein isolate (WPI). Compared with an individual application of HPH or US, a combined HPH-US treatment can further reduce average particle size (D-4,D-3) and turbidity of WPI, while significantly ameliorating its surface hydrophobicity, fluorescence intensity, and free sulfhydryl content. Compared with that of an untreated WPI, the emulsifying ability index (EAI) of WPI was increased by 8.54% after a 120 MPa HPH and by 7.63% after a 600 W US, whereas it increased by 13.97% after a combined treatment of 120 MPa and 600 W HPH-US. Accordingly, the foaming ability (FA) and the foaming stability (FS) were enhanced by 26.10% and 118.18% at 120 MPa and 600 W, respectively. The hardness of WPI gel was also increased by 170.45% at 120 MPa and 600 W compared to the untreated WPI. Therefore, the combination of HPH and US could make a remarkable improvement in the physicochemical functional characteristics of WPI, providing basic data support for the food industry to obtain excellent novel WPI ingredients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available