4.5 Article

Desirable policies of a strategic petroleum reserve in coping with disruption risk: A Markov decision process approach

Journal

COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 66, Issue -, Pages 58-66

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2015.07.017

Keywords

OR in energy; Strategic petroleum reserve (SPR); Oil supply disruption; Markov processes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71403131, 71203081, 71203055]
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [BK20140038]
  3. Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [12YJCZH091]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A Markov decision process model is proposed to examine the desirable sizes and policies of a strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) for oil consumption countries. Oil consumers operate SPRs to cope with various market states. Market uncertainties include oil supply, oil price and disruption situations in which oil supply is highly stochastic. The decision criterion is to minimize total disruption losses and SPR costs. The output of the proposed model finds optimal SPR acquisition, drawdown and refill policies in response to different market states. In a representative numerical case, we examine desirable SPR size and how China should absorb into or release from its SPR in special scenarios. In a new scenario of long-duration disruption risk in particular, we find that high disruption duration risk may increase the optimal SPR size significantly, i.e., 9% greater in this case. Meanwhile, the result shows variation in the SPR drawdown policy when considering various disruption durations. Finally, a United States case has been studied with the developed model. We find interesting results by comparing the results of China and the U.S. Under the scenario of 20% disruption, although with different SPR capacities, both countries should release all SPRs to reduce GDP loss as much as possible. (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available