4.6 Article

Quantifying model structural uncertainty using airborne electromagnetic data

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 224, Issue 1, Pages 590-607

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaa393

Keywords

Non-linear electromagnetics; Inverse theory; Probability distributions; Statistical methods

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Interdisciplinary Methods and Applications in Geophysics (IMAGe) project through Mineral Resources Program
  2. USGS Advanced Research Computing group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article introduces an open-source Bayesian algorithm GeoBIPy for robust uncertainty analysis of AEM data. The algorithm provides a robust assessment of geophysical parameter uncertainty using a trans-dimensional approach and allows users to solve for parameters such as data errors and corrections to measured instrument height. Probability distributions for a user-specified number of lithologic classes are developed through posterior clustering of McMC-derived resistivity models.
The ability to quantify structural uncertainty in geological models that incorporate geophysical data is affected by two primary sources of uncertainty: geophysical parameter uncertainty and uncertainty in the relationship between geophysical parameters and geological properties of interest. Here, we introduce an open-source, trans-dimensional Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (McMC) algorithm GeoBIPy-Geophysical Bayesian Inference in Python-for robust uncertainty analysis of time-domain or frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data. The McMC algorithm provides a robust assessment of geophysical parameter uncertainty using a trans-dimensional approach that lets the AEM data inform the level of model complexity necessary by allowing the number of model layers itself to be an unknown parameter. Additional components of the Bayesian algorithm allow the user to solve for parameters such as data errors or corrections to the measured instrument height above ground. Probability distributions for a user-specified number of lithologic classes are developed through posterior clustering of McMC-derived resistivity models. Estimates of geological model structural uncertainty are thus obtained through the joint probability of geophysical parameter uncertainty and the uncertainty in the definition of each class. Examples of the implementation of this algorithm are presented for both time-domain and frequency-domain AEM data acquired in Nebraska, USA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available