4.7 Article

The effect of additive molecular diameters on the hydrate-based CO2 capture from simulated biogas

Journal

FUEL
Volume 278, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118370

Keywords

Biogas; Phase equilibrium; Separation efficiency; Molecular diameter

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016 M602260, 2018 M632800]
  2. Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province [19A470009]
  3. Henan Provincial Key R&D and Promotion Project [192102210080]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51904330]
  5. Program of Henan Center for Outstanding Overseas Scientists [GZS2018004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lots of thermodynamics and kinetics accelerators have been used in the process of mixture gas separation by hydrate method, but there is still lack of valid screening method for seeking reliable and effective hydrate promoters. In this work, the effects of additive molecular diameter on the hydrate phase equilibrium condition and the quantity of hydrogen bond donor and accepter of additive on the separation efficiency during CO2 (40.0 mol%)/CH4 hydrate formation process were investigated. The results demonstrated that the larger molecular diameter of additive in cyclopentane (CP), tetrahydrofuran (THF) and tetrahydrothiophene (THT) systems, the phase equilibrium promotion effect of additive is more significant. And the empirical equations were proposed for predicting the phase equilibrium condition of CO2/CH4 hydrate under the impact of additive with different molecular diameters. Moreover, on account of the quantity of hydrogen bond donor and acceptor of additive were different, the degree of mutual dissolution between additive molecule and aqueous solution was different, so that the number of additive molecules that could participate in the formation of hydrate was different, which had a certain impact on the separation efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available