4.2 Article

Porous 3D hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering and itsin vitrodegradation behavior

Journal

FERROELECTRICS
Volume 566, Issue 1, Pages 104-115

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00150193.2020.1762434

Keywords

3D scaffolds; hydroxyapatite; aliphatic polyurethane; degradation behavior; bone tissue engineering

Funding

  1. key Project of Sichuan Vanadium and Titanium Industry Development Research Center [2018VTCY-Z-01]
  2. Development and Application Demonstration of Basalt Continuous Fiber Industrialization Complete Technology [2019ZDZX0014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel hydroxyapatite (HA)/polyurethane (PU) composite porous 3D scaffold was developed byin situpolymerization. Aliphatic hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) as a nontoxic and safe agent was adopted to produce the rigid segment in PU polymerization. HA powder was compounded in a PU polymer matrix during the polymeric process. The macrostructure and morphology as well as mechanical strength of the scaffolds were characterized by FTIR, XRD and SEM. The results show that the HDI can react mildly with hydroxyl (-OH) groups of polytetramethylene ether glycol and a mild foaming action caused by the release of CO(2)gas occurred simultaneously in the reactive process, thus producing a uniform porous structure of HA/PU scaffold. The HA/PU composite scaffold with a high HA content of about 30 wt% has a porosity of more than 60% and a pore size from 100 to 800 mu m. After immersed in simulated body fluid, the scaffolds were investigated by weight loss experiments and FTIR. The results show that polymerized component of HA/PU scaffolds degraded graduallyin vitro, while HA component presented a classic trend of dissolution then deposition procedure. Three hydrolysis processes may happen in the PU degradation. The HA/PU scaffolds should be a promising material for bone tissue regeneration in clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available