4.5 Article

A balanced-force control volume finite element method for interfacial flows with surface tension using adaptive anisotropic unstructured meshes

Journal

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages 38-50

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2016.08.005

Keywords

Curvatures; Discontinuous Galerkin; Multiphase flows; Surface tension; Unstructured mesh; Volume of fluid method

Funding

  1. EPSRC MEMPHIS multiphase Programme Grant [EP/K003976/1]
  2. EPSRC UK-Japan Civil Nuclear Energy project [EP/M012794/1]
  3. H2020 IVMR
  4. ExxonMobil
  5. EPSRC [EP/K003976/1, EP/P013198/1, EP/M012794/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/P013198/1, EP/M012794/1, EP/K003976/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A balanced-force control volume finite element method is presented for three-dimensional interfacial flows with surface tension on adaptive anisotropic unstructured meshes. A new balanced-force algorithm for the continuum surface tension model on unstructured meshes is proposed within an interface capturing framework based on the volume of fluid method, which ensures that the surface tension force and the resulting pressure gradient are exactly balanced. Two approaches are developed for accurate curvature approximation based on the volume fraction on unstructured meshes. The numerical framework also features an anisotropic adaptive mesh algorithm, which can modify unstructured meshes to better represent the underlying physics of interfacial problems and reduce computational effort without sacrificing accuracy. The numerical framework is validated with several benchmark problems for interface advection, surface tension test for equilibrium droplet, and dynamic fluid flow problems (fluid films, bubbles and droplets) in two and three dimensions. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available