4.5 Review

Antibacterial carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: an update on the recent literature

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS
Volume 30, Issue 12, Pages 963-982

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13543776.2020.1811853

Keywords

antibacterials; bacteria; carbonic anhydrase inhibitor; sulfonamide; anion

Funding

  1. CNR project NUTR-AGE, FOE- 2019 [DSB.AD004.271]
  2. Italian Ministry for University and Research (MIUR) [2017XYBP2R]
  3. Horizon2020 project Springboard

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction The clinically licensed drugs used as antibiotics prevent the microbial growth interfering with the biosynthesis of proteins, nucleic acids, microorganism wall biosynthesis or wall permeability, and microbial metabolic pathways. A serious, emerging problem is the arisen of extensive drug resistance afflicting most countries worldwide. Areas covered An exciting approach to fight drug resistance is the identification of essential enzymes encoded by pathogen genomes. Inhibition of such enzymes may impair microbial growth or virulence due to interference with crucial metabolic processes. Genome exploration of pathogenic and nonpathogenic microorganisms has revealed carbonic anhydrases (CAs, EC 4.2.1.1) as possible antibacterial targets. Expert opinion Balancing the equilibrium between CO(2)and HCO(3)(-)is essential for microbial metabolism and is regulated by at least four classes of CAs. Classical CA inhibitors (CAIs) such as ethoxzolamide were shown to kill the gastric pathogenHelicobacter pyloriin vitro, whereas acetazolamide and some of its more lipophilic derivatives were shown to be effective against vancomycin-resistantEnterococcusspp., with MICs in the range of 0.007-2 mu g/mL, better than linezolid, the only clinically used agent available to date. Such results reinforce the rationale of considering existing and newly designed CAIs as antibacterials with an alternative mechanism of action.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available