4.7 Article

Assessment of nicotine release from nicotine-loaded chitosan nanoparticles dry powder inhaler formulations via locomotor activity of C57BL/6 mice

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.07.011

Keywords

Lung drug delivery; Dry powder inhaler formulation; Inhalation; Nicotine; Chitosan; Nanoparticles; Aerosolization; Locomotor activity

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. Queensland University of Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the activity of controlled release nicotine from dry powder inhaler formulation via locomotor activity of C57BL/6 mice. Methods: To achieve this we built a nose-only inhalation device for pulmonary administration of nicotine to mice and determined the optimal operational parameters. We used the locomotor activity test to compare the effects of the inhaled nicotine hydrogen tartrate-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (NHT-CS) with NHT in C57BL/6 mice. The minimum inhaled dose of NHT-CS required to alter locomotor activity was compared with inhaled and subcutaneously (s.c) injected NHT. Finally, histological examination of lung tissues was performed to ensure inhalation of NHT-CS did not cause lung damage. Results: We found a flow rate of 0.9 L/min and an exposure time of 5 min achieved optimal delivery of nicotine. A minimum of 0.88 mg inhaled of NHT-CS or 0.59 mg inhaled of NHT was required to alter locomotor activity similarly to injection of 0.5 mg/kg nicotine, suggesting the reformulation process did not alter the activity of NHT-CS. No differences between untreated and NHT-CS treated lung tissue upon histological examination were observed. Conclusions: The results indicated the inhaled NHT-CS is a viable preclinical option for developing novel inhalation formulations as a potential anti-smoking therapeutic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available