4.4 Article

Adherence to oral chemotherapy: Evidence from a randomised clinical trial

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13336

Keywords

cancer care; hospital pharmacist; medication adherence; oral chemotherapy; personality traits; temperament and character inventory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that reinforcement messages provided by hospital pharmacists have a positive impact on adherence among patients undergoing oral chemotherapy, leading to higher drug levels and better subjective evaluation scores.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a reinforcement message (RM) administered by a hospital pharmacist on adherence, through a randomised study involving patients undergoing oral chemotherapy from which an objective outcome measure and patients' subjective opinions were collected. A secondary aim was to detect which psychological or clinical factors influence adherence. Methods Forty patients were enrolled and randomised to an experimental group (EG) or a control group (CG). The EG received a 10-minute RM provided by a hospital pharmacist with a doctor and a nurse. The CG received the standard of care. To measure adherence, plasma drug concentration and subjective evaluation were taken during the visits, in addition to a psychological assessment (coping strategies, psychological distress and personality traits). Results The EG reported higher drug levels and a statistically significant higher mean score on the subjective evaluation. A linear regression model highlighted statistically significant differences in the plasma drug concentration, after considering toxicity and dose reduction and controlling for the Reward Dependence Scale of the Temperament and Character Inventory between the EG and the CG. Conclusion Adequate information and education on the therapy, using an RM strategy provided by a hospital pharmacist, seems to positively influence adherence to the treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available