4.5 Article

The Analysis of Japan's Energy and Climate Policy from the Aspect of Anticipatory Governance

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 13, Issue 19, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13195153

Keywords

anticipatory governance; foresight; engagement; integration; renewables; Fukushima; energy policy; energy transition; climate change policy

Categories

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [16KT0095, JPJSBP120203502]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16KT0095] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is a preliminary and experimental one to analyze Japan's energy transitions to mitigate climate change from anticipatory governance aspects. Japan's energy policy principles have been energy security, environmental considerations, economic efficiency, and safety (3E + S). According to the energy agency, the long-term energy outlook is also drawn up by ambitious multiple track scenarios and multilayered and diversified flexible energy supply-demand structure. This approach resonates with the aspects of anticipatory governance. It promotes the idea of preparing for multiple future scenarios, including the unthinkable worst case future scenario such as a nuclear accident (foresight), the interactions between the policymakers and the public (engagement), and the reflexive processes of policy innovations with a normative decision for the selection of energy mix (integration). However, this study finds that Japan's energy policy lacks the aspects of anticipatory governance. It sticks to fixed energy policy institutionalized in the 1970s to promote nuclear energy and coal as oil alternatives. It rarely has interactions between the policymakers and the public and thus lacks a societal (normative) decision about a future energy path to energy transitions to mitigate climate change. Instead, Japan's energy policy has not necessarily met its declared policy objective of 3E + S since the unprecedented Fukushima nuclear accidents occurred and cannot uphold an ambitious target for CO2 emissions reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available