4.7 Article

Impact of low-level mercury exposure on intelligence quotient in children via rice consumption

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110870

Keywords

Mercury; Hair; Children; Intelligence quotient; Wanshan

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1812403, 41622208]
  2. Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Monitoring and Disease Control, Ministry of Education, Guizhou Medical University [GMU-2018-HJZ-03]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences [2017442]
  4. Chinese Academy of Sciences Light of West China Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wanshan is a city in southwest China that has several inactive mercury (Hg) mines. The local population are exposed to methylmercury (MeHg) due to the consumption of Hg contaminated rice. The relationship between Hg exposure and the cognitive functions of local children is unknown. This study investigated the relationship between hair Hg concentrations and the intelligence quotient (IQ) of 314 children aged 8-10 years, recruited from three local primary schools in Wanshan area in 2018 and 2019. IQ was evaluated using Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). The average THg concentration in children's hair samples was 1.53 mu g g(-1) (range: 0.21-12.6 mu g g(-1)), and 65.6% exceeded the United States Environment Protection Agency (USEPA) recommended value of 1 mu g g(-1). Results of logistic regression analysis showed that children with hair Hg >= 1 mu g g(-1) were 1.58 times more likely to have an IQ score < 80, which is the clinical cutoff for borderline intellectual disability (R-2 = 0.20, p = 0.03). Increasing of 1 mu g g(-1) hair Hg resulted in 1 point of IQ loss in Wanshan children, which was.much higher than that via fish consumption. The economical cost due to Hg exposure was estimated to be $69.8 million (9.43% of total GDP) in the Wanshan area in 2018.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available