4.7 Article

Loss of dmrt1 restores zebrafish female fates in the absence of cyp19a1a but not rbpms2a/b

Journal

DEVELOPMENT
Volume 147, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.190942

Keywords

Rbpms; Sex-determination; Bipotential; Cyp19a1a; Dmrt1; TGF beta

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [2R01GM089979, 1R01GM133896]
  2. National Institutes of Health [T32-GM007288, F32 1F32HD09789801A1]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [F30HD082903]
  4. New York Stem Cell Foundation training grant [C32561GG]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sex determination and differentiation is a complex process regulated by multiple factors, including factors from the germline or surrounding somatic tissue. In zebrafish, sex-determination involves establishment of a bipotential ovary that undergoes sex-specific differentiation and maintenance to form the functional adult gonad. However, the relationships among these factors are not fully understood. Here, we identify potential Rbpms2 targets and apply genetic epistasis experiments to decipher the genetic hierarchy of regulators of sex-specific differentiation. We provide genetic evidence that the crucial female factor rbpms2 is epistatic to the male factor dmrt1 in terms of adult sex. Moreover, the role of Rbpms2 in promoting female fates extends beyond repression of Dmrt1, as Rbpms2 is essential for female differentiation even in the absence of Dmrt1. In contrast, female fates can be restored in mutants lacking both cyp19a1a and dmrt1, and prolonged in bmp15 mutants in the absence of dmrt1. Taken together, this work indicates that cyp19a1a-mediated suppression of dmrt1 establishes a bipotential ovary and initiates female fate acquisition. Then, after female fate specification, Cyp19a1a regulates subsequent oocyte maturation and sustains female fates independently of Dmrt1 repression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available