4.5 Review

Effect of resistant starch type 2 on inflammatory mediators: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Journal

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102597

Keywords

Resistant starch; Dietary fiber; Interleukin-6 (IL-6); Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-a); C-reactive protein (CRP)

Funding

  1. Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences [98-04-141]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that RS2 could not reduce inflammatory mediators, but more randomized controlled trials with longer intervention duration, higher dose, and studies in different countries are still needed.
Background: Inflammation is the main cause in the development of chronic diseases. The enhancement of proinflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is the main risk factor in chronic diseases. Resistant starch type 2 (RS2) is non-gelatinized granules which their enzymatic hydrolysis is very low. RS2 might be able to reduce inflammatory mediators, therefore; our aim for this study was indicating RS2 effects on inflammatory mediators such as IL-6, TNF-a, and CRP among healthy and unhealthy subjects. Methods: Articles which assessed RS2 effect on IL-6, TNF-alpha, and hs-CRP were found by advanced search methods. Electronic databases including Google scholar, ISI web of science, SCOPUS, and PubMed, were searched up to October 2019. Treatment effect was the mean difference between changes in serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers in each arm of the clinical trials. To pool the effect of resistant starch on inflammatory biomarkers, we used random effects model. Results: We included eight articles in systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall effect illustrated no significant change in serum levels of hs-CRP, IL-6, and TNF-alpha in intervention group compared with the control group (WMD: -7.18 pg/mL, 95% CI: -27.80, 13.45; P = 0.495, I-2 = 100.0%, WMD: -0.003 pg/mL, 95% CI: -0.07, 0.06; P = 0.919, I-2 = 98.1%, WMD: -0.003 pg/mL, 95% CI: -0.004, -0.001; P < 0.0001, I-2 = 98.0% respectively). Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that RS2 could not reduce inflammatory mediators, but we still need more RCTs with longer intervention duration, higher dose, and studies in different countries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available