4.5 Article

Artificial intelligence-driven novel tool for tooth detection and segmentation on panoramic radiographs

Journal

CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 2257-2267

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03544-6

Keywords

Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Panoramic radiography; Tooth; Classification

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa do Distrito Federal-FAP-DF [23106.013588/2019-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the performance of a new AI-driven tool for tooth detection and segmentation on panoramic radiographs, demonstrating highly accurate and fast results compared to manual segmentation. The AI tool showed a sensitivity of 98.9% and a precision of 99.6% for tooth detection, with lower canines presenting the best segmentation results. The method also significantly reduced the time consumed for manual segmentation by 67%.
Objective To evaluate the performance of a new artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tool for tooth detection and segmentation on panoramic radiographs. Materials and methods In total, 153 radiographs were collected. A dentomaxillofacial radiologist labeled and segmented each tooth, serving as the ground truth. Class-agnostic crops with one tooth resulted in 3576 training teeth. The AI-driven tool combined two deep convolutional neural networks with expert refinement. Accuracy of the system to detect and segment teeth was the primary outcome, time analysis secondary. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate differences of performance metrics among teeth groups and different devices and chi-square test to verify associations among the amount of corrections, presence of false positive and false negative, and crown and root parts of teeth with potential AI misinterpretations. Results The system achieved a sensitivity of 98.9% and a precision of 99.6% for tooth detection. For segmenting teeth, lower canines presented best results with the following values for intersection over union, precision, recall, F1-score, and Hausdorff distances: 95.3%, 96.9%, 98.3%, 97.5%, and 7.9, respectively. Although still above 90%, segmentation results for both upper and lower molars were somewhat lower. The method showed a clinically significant reduction of 67% of the time consumed for the manual. Conclusions The AI tool yielded a highly accurate and fast performance for detecting and segmenting teeth, faster than the ground truth alone. Clinical significance An innovative clinical AI-driven tool showed a faster and more accurate performance to detect and segment teeth on panoramic radiographs compared with manual segmentation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available