4.6 Article

A two-level approach to large mixed-integer programs with application to cogeneration in energy-efficient buildings

Journal

COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 1-46

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-016-9842-0

Keywords

Coarsened models; Distributed generation; Large-scale problems; Two-level approach; Multi-period planning; Resource and cost allocation; Two-stage mixed-integer programs

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Applied Mathematics program [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study a two-stage mixed-integer linear program (MILP) with more than 1 million binary variables in the second stage. We develop a two-level approach by constructing a semi-coarse model that coarsens with respect to variables and a coarse model that coarsens with respect to both variables and constraints. We coarsen binary variables by selecting a small number of prespecified on/off profiles. We aggregate constraints by partitioning them into groups and taking convex combination over each group. With an appropriate choice of coarsened profiles, the semi-coarse model is guaranteed to find a feasible solution of the original problem and hence provides an upper bound on the optimal solution. We show that solving a sequence of coarse models converges to the same upper bound with proven finite steps. This is achieved by adding violated constraints to coarse models until all constraints in the semi-coarse model are satisfied. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in cogeneration for buildings. The coarsened models allow us to obtain good approximate solutions at a fraction of the time required by solving the original problem. Extensive numerical experiments show that the two-level approach scales to large problems that are beyond the capacity of state-of-the-art commercial MILP solvers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available