4.6 Article

Effect of the propagation direction of the weak dynamic disturbance on rock failure: an experimental study

Journal

BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 80, Issue 2, Pages 1507-1521

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-020-01960-2

Keywords

Underground excavation; Rockburst; Rock strength; Failure form; Dynamic disturbance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51809051, 51869003]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M661119]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Weak dynamic disturbances such as drilling and blasting, as well as machine vibration, play a significant role in causing rock failure during underground excavation. The direction of these disturbances affects the rock failure process. Experimental results show that weak dynamic disturbances decrease rock strength, with P(d3) having the greatest impact.
Weak dynamic disturbance caused by drilling and blasting, adjacent rockburst, and machine vibration is a key factor to rock failure/rockburst during underground excavation. Meanwhile, the propagation direction of weak dynamic disturbances varies when different underground constructions are encountered. To investigate the effect of the propagation direction of the weak dynamic disturbance on rock failure, a general true triaxial test (applying a loading state of six stressed faces) and a modified true triaxial test (applying a loading state of one free face and five stressed faces) are conducted. For the former test,P-d1(weak dynamic disturbance along the direction of sigma(1)),P-d2(weak dynamic disturbance along the direction of sigma(2)), andP(d3)(weak dynamic disturbance along the direction of sigma(3)) are involved. For the latter test, onlyP(d1)andP(d2)are involved due to the limitation of the testing machine used. After testing, the rock strength and macroscopic failure characteristics of the tested specimens are systematically investigated. The experimental results indicate that the rock strength of the tested specimen without weak dynamic disturbance is higher than those with weak dynamic disturbance, indicating a reduction effect of the weak dynamic disturbance on the rock strength.P(d3)has the greatest reduction effect on rock strength due to its greatest promotion effect on crack development, while the reduction effect ofP(d1)on rock strength, as well as its promotion effect on crack development, is smallest. In addition, for the tested specimens with a free face, the failure process is observed and investigated. Rockburst characterized by rock fragment ejection occurs during the testing process of these specimens. The kinetic energy of the ejected blocks without weak dynamic disturbance is higher than that with weak dynamic disturbance, showing that the weak dynamic disturbance has a reduction effect on kinetic energy. In addition, the kinetic energy of ejected blocks is lower under theP(d2)condition than that under theP(d1)condition; consequently,P(d2)has a greater influence on the kinetic energy of the ejected blocks, i.e., the intensity of rockburst.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available