4.1 Article

Vacuolar compartmentalisation and efflux of cadmium in barley

Journal

BOTANY
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjb-2020-0080

Keywords

cadmium; vacuolar sequestration; chelation; efflux; Hordeum vulgare; transport assays

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plants have developed various tolerance strategies to deal with toxic metals, including compartmentalising toxic metals into vacuoles and actively effluxing cadmium. Research has shown that a combination of ATP and GSH can increase Cd uptake into vacuoles in barley, where Cd is mainly located in the form of complexes. Additionally, a portion of root Cd can be actively excreted into the external solution as a detoxification strategy.
Plants have developed different tolerance strategies to deal with toxic metals. Various factors and mechanisms related to the compartmentalisation of cadmium (Cd) into the vacuoles and the efflux of Cd were investigated to analyse their roles in Cd tolerance in barley. In vacuolar transport assays, the addition of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) alone significantly increased Cd uptake into the vacuole, but more so when both ATP and glutathione (GSH) were supplied together. This suggests that Cd may be partly sequestered as Cd2+ ions via divalent cation transporters, but predominantly as Cd-GSH complexes, most likely via ATP-binding cassette transportertype transporters. Comparison of the concentrations of Cd-109 in whole protoplasts and vacuoles isolated from shoots demonstrated that the majority of the cellular Cd was located in the vacuole. Over 48 h, 12% of the root Cd was effluxed into the external solution when roots were loaded with Cd-109 by foliar application. This active excretion may be a detoxification strategy, in addition to the compartmentalisation of the majority of cellular cadmium into vacuoles predominantly as complexed form.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available