4.8 Review

Radiation recall pneumonitis induced by PD-1/PD-L1 blockades: mechanisms and therapeutic implications

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01718-3

Keywords

Radiation recall pneumonitis; Radiation; Anti-PD-1; PD-L1; Lung cancer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81803066, NSFC 81972863]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The synergistic effect of radiotherapy (RT) in combination with immunotherapy has been shown in several clinical trials and case reports. The overlapping pulmonary toxicity induced by thoracic RT and programmed death 1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockades is an important issue of clinical investigation in combination treatment. Thus far, the underlying mechanism of this toxicity remains largely unknown. Main text: In this review, we discuss the unique pattern of radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) induced by PD-1 blockade. The clinical presentation is different from common radiation pneumonitis (RP) or RRP induced by cytotoxic drugs. The immune checkpoint inhibitors may evoke an inflammatory reaction in patients' previously irradiated fields, with infiltrating lymphocytes and potential involvement of related cytokines. All RRP patients have showed durable response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1. RRP is manageable; however, interruption of checkpoint blockades is necessary and immunosuppressive treatment should be started immediately. Further analyses of the predictive factors, including RT dosimetric parameters, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and PD-L1 expression, are needed given the wide use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and high mortality from lung toxicity with the combination treatment. Conclusion: Immune checkpoint inhibitors may evoke an RRP in the patients' previously irradiated fields. Interactions between immune checkpoint inhibitors and radiotherapy should be studied further.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available