4.8 Article

An inverted CAV1 (caveolin 1) topology defines novel autophagy-dependent exosome secretion from prostate cancer cells

Journal

AUTOPHAGY
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages 2200-2216

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1820787

Keywords

Autophagosome; autophagy; caveolin 1; CAVIN1; endosome; exosome; prostate cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [APP1108859, APP569542, APP1058565, APP1045092, APP1037320, APP1060075, APP1041929]
  2. Australian Research Council [FT120100251, FT110100478, DP170100125]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT110100478, FT120100251] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CAV1 can be secreted in an inverted form from specific types of prostate cancer cells, and released through a non-canonical autophagy pathway, representing a novel class of exosomes.
CAV1 (caveolin 1) expression and secretion is associated with prostate cancer (PCa) disease progression, but the mechanisms underpinning CAV1 release remain poorly understood. Numerous studies have shown CAV1 can be secreted within exosome-like vesicles, but antibody-mediated neutralization can mitigate PCa progression; this is suggestive of an inverted (non-exosomal) CAV1 topology. Here we show that CAV1 can be secreted from specific PCa types in an inverted vesicle-associated form consistent with the features of bioactive CAV1 secretion. Characterization of the isolated vesicles by electron microscopy, single-molecule fluorescence microscopy and proteomics reveals they represent a novel class of exosomes similar to 40 nm in diameter containing similar to 50-60 copies of CAV1 and, strikingly, are released via a non-canonical secretory macroautophagy/autophagy pathway. This study provides novel insights into a mechanism whereby CAV1 translocates from a normal plasma membrane distribution to an inverted secreted form implicated in PCa disease progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available