4.2 Article

Tongue strength, dysphagia questionnaire, pharyngeal secretions and FEES findings in dysphagia management in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Journal

AURIS NASUS LARYNX
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages 672-682

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2020.10.007

Keywords

Dysphagia; Swallowing; Tongue strength; Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; Secretions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate tongue strength measurements, dysphagia questionnaire, pharyngeal secretions, and Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) findings in the management of dysphagia in ALS patients. Reduced tongue strength, questionnaire-reported symptoms, pharyngeal secretions, and FEES findings can guide the identification of ALS patients at risk of inefficient and unsafe swallowing.
Objective: Dysphagia is common in Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS shows significant phenotypic variability. It is characterized by progressive weakness and/or spasticity of muscles. Dysphagia symptoms vary. Aspiration is often silent and cognitive dysfunction is common. The purpose of the study was to evaluate tongue strength measurements, dysphagia questionnaire, the presence of pharyngeal secretions, and FEES findings in dysphagia management in ALS. Methods: Twenty-five patients completed the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), had their Maximum Isometric Tongue Pressure (MITP), and endurance measured and underwent Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) providing 31 examinations. Results: Out of 25 patients, 76% were self-reported as dysphagic (EAT-10 >3) with a mean EAT-10 at 14.95 (+/- 7.96). ALS patients had significantly decreased tongue strength (mean MITPanterior: 31.69 +/- 17.32kPa). Comparing examinations of dysphagic and non-dysphagic status the mean MITPa of non-dysphagic was significantly greater (52.33 +/- 10.97 kPa versus 20.6 +/- 12.67 kPa), p < 0.001. FEES detected aspiration in 10 out of 31 examinations [Penetration Aspiration Scale(PAS) >6]. Aspirator status examinations showed statistically significantly worse cough (p = 0.001), tongue strength (p = 0.001) and endurance (p = 0.003), pharyngeal secretions (p < 0.001), velopharyngeal sufficiency (p = 0.006), pharyngeal squeeze (p = 0.009), vocal cords' movements (p = 0.001), pharyngeal pooling (p < 0.001), EAT-10 (p = 0.001) and bulbar subscale of ALS Functioning Rating Scale-Revised (b-ALSFRS-R) scores (p = 0.014) compared to non-aspirator status. Correlation analysis indicated that the feeding status had strong statistically significant correlations with the EAT-10 score (rho = -0.816), anterior tongue strength (rho = 0.735), secretions (rho = -0.811), pharyngeal pooling (rho = -0.712) and PAS (rho = -0.676) at FEES, and b-ALSFRS-R score (rho = 0.791), all p < 0.001. The EAT-10 had strong statistically significant correlations with the MITPa (r = -0.794, p < 0.001), secretions (rho = 0.668, p < 0.001), and b-ALSFRS-R score (rho =-0.766, p = 0.001). The FEES-findings had strong statistically significant correlations with the anterior tongue strength (pooling: rho = -0.784), and secretions (PAS: rho = 0.723; pooling: rho = 0.671), all p < 0.001. For the questionnaire, tongue strength and pharyngeal secretions, ROC analysis assessed cut-off points and discriminating ability to predict aspiration status (Area Under the Curve: 0.838; 0.845 and 0.93, respectively). EAT-10 with a cut-off at 8 was able to predict aspirator status with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 42.9% (negative predictive value-NPV = 100%). A cut-off value of 22KPa for the MITPa discriminated aspirator status (sensitivity = 80%, specificity = 89.5%, NPV = 89.5%). The quantity of secretions observed upon endoscopy with a cut-off value at 1 was able to predict aspirator status (sensitivity = 90%, specificity = 80%, NPV = 94.1%). Conclusion: Reduced tongue strength, questionnaire-reported symptoms, pharyngeal secretions, and FESS findings can guide identification of patients with ALS at risk of inefficient and unsafe swallowing. (C) 2020 Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan Inc. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available