4.5 Article

Automatic Detection of Oil Palm Tree from UAV Images Based on the Deep Learning Method

Journal

APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 13-24

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08839514.2020.1831226

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University Malaysia Pahang [PGRS1903142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a new automatic method based on deep-learning for detection and counting of oil palm trees from UAV images, which proves to be more effective and accurate.
Palm oil is a major contributor to Malaysia's GDP in the agriculture sector. The sheer vastness of oil palm plantations requires a huge effort to administer. An oil palm plantation in regards to the irrigation process, fertilization, and planning for planting new trees require an audit process to correctly count the oil palm trees. Currently, the audit is done manually using aerial view images. Therefore, an effective and efficient method is imperative. This paper proposes a new automatic end-to-end method based on deep learning (DL) for detection and counting oil palm trees from images obtained from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) drone. The acquired images were first cropped and sampled into small size of sub-images, which were divided into a training set, a validation set, and a testing set. A DL algorithm based on Faster-RCNN was employed to build the model, extracts features from the images and identifies the oil palm trees, and gives information on the respective locations. The model was then trained and used to detect individual oil palm tree based on data from the testing set. The overall accuracy of oil palm tree detection was measured from three different sites with 97.06%, 96.58%, and 97.79% correct oil palm detection. The results show that the proposed method is more effective, accurate detection, and correctly counts the number of oil palm trees from the UAV images.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available