4.4 Article

Digitalization and the third food regime

Journal

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 641-655

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10460-020-10161-2

Keywords

Food regime; Digital agriculture; Agri-food system; Food commodity chain; Agrarian labor; Digital platforms

Funding

  1. BMBF [FKZ 031B0750]
  2. Projekt DEAL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses how digital technologies are changing the organization of the agri-food system in the context of the third food regime. It argues that digital technologies are both a continuation of established information and communication technologies and introduce new forms of control and value extraction based on data, paving the way for large tech companies to take over market shares in the agri-food sector. Additionally, multinational agri-food companies are adopting business models from leading digital tech companies, showcasing the broader economic restructuring towards digital capitalism in the agri-food system.
This article asks how the application of digital technologies is changing the organization of the agri-food system in the context of the third food regime. The academic debate on digitalization and food largely focuses on the input and farm level. Yet, based on the analysis of 280 digital services and products, we show that digital technologies are now being used along the entire food commodity chain. We argue that digital technologies in the third food regime serve on the one hand as a continuation of established information and communication technologies, thus deepening certain features of the existing food regime such as the retail sector's control over global commodity chains. On the other hand, digital technologies also introduce new forms of control and value extraction based on the use of data and pave the way for large tech companies to take over market shares in the agri-food sector. Finally, we find that multinational agri-food companies are starting to take on the business models of leading digital tech companies, for instance by developing digital platforms throughout the agri-food system. We argue that this shows that the broader economic restructuring of neoliberal capitalism towards digital capitalism is also making its way into the agri-food system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Digital Agriculture and Labor: A Few Challenges for Social Sustainability

Louisa Prause

Summary: Academic and political discussions on the digitalization of agriculture have mainly focused on ecological sustainability, neglecting social sustainability aspects, particularly labor. Digital technologies are bringing new forms of labor control and intensification of work processes, with risks of working-class fragmentation along age lines. The importance of designing agricultural policies that foster fair and equitable working conditions is emphasized in the results.

SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

Review Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Patterns of Inequalities in Digital Agriculture: A Systematic Literature Review

Sarah Hackfort

Summary: The digitalization of agriculture has introduced various forms of inequality, including in technology development, benefit distribution, data sovereignty, digital literacy, and problem-solving capacities. While there are emancipatory initiatives challenging existing inequalities, the structural nature of inequalities and corporate power continue to limit the potential impact of digital agriculture initiatives.

SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

The making of sustainability: ideological strategies, the materiality of nature, and biomass use in the bioeconomy

Miriam Boyer, Franziska Kusche, Sarah Hackfort, Louisa Prause, Friederike Engelbrecht-Bock

Summary: This study analyzes the broad field of biomass policy in Germany and explores how the image of sustainability of biomass use in the bioeconomy is constructed and maintained. Through ideology critique, the study identifies four central ideological strategies that uphold the image of sustainability and emphasizes the importance of considering the materiality of nature in the bioeconomy context.

SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE (2023)

Article Agriculture, Multidisciplinary

African indigenous vegetables, gender, and the political economy of commercialization in Kenya

Sarah Hackfort, Christoph Kubitza, Arnold Opiyo, Anne Musotsi, Susanne Huyskens-Keil

Summary: This study investigates the impact of the commercialization of African indigenous vegetables on gender relations in labor, decision-making power, and access to resources. The findings reveal that while women experience economic empowerment through commercialization, it does not contribute to gender equality in terms of labor redistribution or land rights. Instead, it increases women's labor burden.

AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES (2023)

Article Geography

Unlocking sustainability? The power of corporate lock-ins and how they shape digital agriculture in Germany

Sarah Hackfort

Summary: The digital transformation of agriculture is seen as a sustainable strategy, but recent studies highlight the monopoly and power dynamics in the digital economy that determine control over digital technology and distribution of benefits. Empirical research is needed to understand and break unsustainable lock-ins in agriculture. This article fills this research gap by examining lock-ins in Germany and identifying the need for disruption at multiple levels for sustainable transformations.

JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES (2023)

Article Anthropology

Struggles for land: comparing resistance movements against agro-industrial and mining investment projects

Louisa Prause, Philippe Le Billon

Summary: This study compares movements resisting agro-industrial and mining projects, finding that outcomes mainly depend on specific cases and political opportunities, while resistance motives, narratives, and practices differ across both sectors. This difference can be explained by sector-specific factors and presents challenges for cross-sectoral alliances.

JOURNAL OF PEASANT STUDIES (2021)

Article Political Science

Conflicts over GMOs and their Contribution to Food Democracy

Beate Friedrich, Sarah Hackfort, Miriam Boyer, Daniela Gottschlich

POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE (2019)

Article Development Studies

Success and failure of protest actors' framing strategies in conflicts over land and mining in Senegal

Louisa Prause

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-REVUE CANADIENNE D ETUDES DU DEVELOPPEMENT (2019)

Article Political Science

Analyzing socio-ecological transformations - a relational approach to gender and climate adaptation

Sarah Hackfort, Hans-Juergen Burchardt

CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES (2018)

No Data Available