4.8 Article

Time-Gated FRET Nanoprobes for Autofluorescence-Free Long-Term In Vivo Imaging of Developing Zebrafish

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 39, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202003912

Keywords

Forster resonance energy transfer; imaging; lanthanides; multiplexing; quantum dots

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency (ANR)
  2. Region Normandie (Chaire d'Excellence COBRA-FRET)
  3. Institut Universitaire de France (IUF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The zebrafish is an important vertebrate model for disease, drug discovery, toxicity, embryogenesis, and neuroscience. In vivo fluorescence microscopy can reveal cellular and subcellular details down to the molecular level with fluorescent proteins (FPs) currently the main tool for zebrafish imaging. However, long maturation times, low brightness, photobleaching, broad emission spectra, and sample autofluorescence are disadvantages that cannot be easily overcome by FPs. Here, a bright and photostable terbium-to-quantum dot (QD) Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) nanoprobe with narrow and tunable emission bands for intracellular in vivo imaging is presented. The long photoluminescence (PL) lifetime enables time-gated (TG) detection without autofluorescence background. Intracellular four-color multiplexing with a single excitation wavelength and in situ assembly and FRET to mCherry demonstrate the versatility of the TG-FRET nanoprobes and the possibility of in vivo bioconjugation to FPs and combined nanoprobe-FP FRET sensing. Upon injection at the one-cell stage, FRET nanoprobes can be imaged in developing zebrafish embryos over seven days with toxicity similar to injected RNA and strongly improved signal-to-background ratios compared to non-TG imaging. This work provides a strategy for advancing in vivo fluorescence imaging applications beyond the capabilities of FPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available