4.5 Article

Glucosensing in liver and Brockmann bodies of rainbow trout through glucokinase-independent mechanisms

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2015.09.008

Keywords

Rainbow trout; Glucosensing; Liver; Brockmann bodies

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BES-2011-043394, BES-2014-068040]
  2. European Fund for Regional Development (FEDER) [AGL2013-46448-C3-1-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We hypothesize that glucosensor mechanisms other than that mediated by glucokinase (GK) are present in the liver and Brockmann bodies (BB) of rainbow trout, and are affected by stress. We evaluated in these tissues changes in parameters related to putative glucosensor mechanisms based on liver X receptor (LXR), mitochondrial activity, sweet taste receptor, and SGLT-1 6 h after intraperitoneal injection of saline solution alone (normoglycaemic treatment) or containing insulin (hypoglycaemic treatment), or D-glucose (hyperglycaemic treatment). Half of tanks were kept at normal stocking density (NSD; 10 kg fish mass.m(-3)) whereas the remaining tanks were kept at high stocking density (HSD; 70 kg fish mass. m(-3)). The results provide for the first time in fish evidence for the presence of putative glucosensor systems based on mitochondrial activity and sweet taste receptor in liver whereas in BB systems based on LXR, mitochondrial activity, sweet taste receptor, and SGLT-1 could be operative. We also obtained for the first time in fish evidence for the functioning of integrative metabolic sensors in response to changes in nutrient levels since changes in the mRNA abundance of sirtuin 1 (SIRT-1) were observed in response to increased glucose levels. The stress conditions elicited by HSD altered the response of the glucosensor systems based on mitochondrial activity, sweet taste receptor, and SGLT-1 in the liver, and LXR and SGLT-1 in the BB. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available