4.6 Article

Effect of the ASCENT Intervention to Increase Knowledge of Kidney Allocation Policy Changes Among Dialysis Providers

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages 1422-1431

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.06.027

Keywords

dialysis; effectiveness-implementation trial; health system intervention; kidney allocation system; kidney transplantation; pragmatic trial

Funding

  1. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [R01MD010290]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The Allocation System Changes for Equity in Kidney Transplantation (ASCENT) trial was a cluster-randomized pragmatic, effectiveness-implementation study designed to test whether a multicomponent educational intervention targeting leadership, clinic staff, and patients in dialysis facilities improved knowledge and awareness of the 2014 Kidney Allocation System (KAS) change. Methods: Participants included 690 dialysis facility medical directors, nephrologists, social workers, and other staff within 655 US dialysis facilities, with 51% (n = 334) in the intervention group and 49% (n = 321) in the control group. Intervention activities included a webinar targeting medical directors and facility staff, an approximately 10-minute educational video targeting dialysis staff, an approximately 10-minute educational video targeting patients, and a facility-specific audit and feedback report of transplant performance. The control group received a standard United Network for Organ Sharing brochure. Provider knowledge was a secondary outcome of the ASCENT trial and the primary outcome of this study; knowledge was assessed as a cumulative score on a 5-point Likert scale (higher score = greater knowledge). Intention-to-treat analysis was used. Results: At baseline, nonintervention providers had a higher mean knowledge score (mean +/- SD, 2.45 +/- 1.43) than intervention providers (mean +/- SD, 2.31 +/- 1.46). After 3 months, the average knowledge score was slightly higher in the intervention (mean +/- SD, 3.14 +/- 1.28) versus nonintervention providers (mean +/- SD, 3.07 +/- 1.24), and the estimated mean difference in knowledge scores between the groups at follow-up minus the mean difference at baseline was 0.25 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.48; P = 0.039). The effect size (0.41) was low to moderate. Conclusion: Dialysis facility provider education could help extend the impact of a national policy change in organ allocation. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier, Inc., on behalf of the International Society of Nephrology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available