4.6 Article

Soft Magnetic Tactile Skin for Continuous Force and Location Estimation Using Neural Networks

Journal

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 3892-3898

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2020.2983707

Keywords

Magnetometers; Soft magnetic materials; Skin; Robot sensing systems; Force; Magnetomechanical effects; Soft sensors and actuators; force and tactile sensing; soft robot materials and design

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) [DGE 1252522]
  2. National Oceanographic Partnership Program (NOPP) [N000141812843]
  3. U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) [N000141812843] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soft tactile skins can provide an in-depth understanding of contact location and force through a soft and deformable interface. However, widespread implementation of soft robotic sensing skins remains limited due to non-scalable fabrication techniques, lack of customization, and complex integration requirements. In this work, we demonstrate magnetic composites fabricated with two different matrix materials, a silicone elastomer and urethane foam, that can be used as continuous tactile surfaces for single-point contact localization. Building upon previous work, we increased the sensing area from a 15 mm(2) grid to a 40 mm(2) continuous surface. Additionally, new preprocessing methods for the raw magnetic field data, in conjunction with the use of a neural network, enables rapid location and force estimation in free space. We report an average localization of 1 mm(3) for the silicone surface and 2 mm(3) for the urethane foam. Our approach to soft sensing skins addresses the need for tactile soft surfaces that are simple to fabricate and integrate, customizable in shape and material, and usable in both soft and hybrid robotic systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available