4.6 Article

Recipient and donor genetic variants associated with mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Journal

BLOOD ADVANCES
Volume 4, Issue 14, Pages 3224-3233

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001927

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [AI33484, AI149213]
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA015704, CA18029]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL087690, HL088201, HL094260, HL105914, K23HL69860]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies have suggested that genetic variants in donors and recipients are associated with survival-related outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but these results have not been confirmed. Therefore, the utility of testing genetic variants in donors and recipients for risk stratification or understanding mechanisms leading to mortality after HCT has not been established. We tested 122 recipient and donor candidate variants for association with nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse mortality (RM) in a cohort of 2560 HCT recipients of European ancestry with related or unrelated donors. Associations discovered in this cohort were tested for replication in a separate cohort of 1710 HCT recipients. We found that the donor rs1051792 A allele in MICA was associated with a lower risk of NRM. Donor and recipient rs1051792 genotypes were highly correlated, making it statistically impossible to determine whether the donor or recipient genotype accounted for the association. Risks of grade 3 to 4 graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and NRM in patients with grades 3 to 4 GVHD were lower with donor MICA-129Met but not with MICA-129Val, implicating MICA-129Met in the donor as an explanation for the decreased risk of NRM after HCT. Our analysis of candidate variants did not show any other association with NRM or RM. A genome-wide association study did not identify any other variants associated with NRM or RM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available