Journal
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/2325967120938312
Keywords
femoroacetabular impingement syndrome; cam morphology; hip; alpha angle; diagnosis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: The alpha angle is the most often used measure to classify cam morphology. There is currently no agreement on which alpha angle threshold value to use. Purpose: To systematically investigate the different alpha angle threshold values used for defining cam morphology in studies aiming to identify this threshold and to determine whether data are consistent enough to suggest an alpha angle threshold to classify cam morphology. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The Embase, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar databases were searched from database inception to February 28, 2019. Studies aiming at identifying an alpha angle threshold to classify cam morphology were eligible for inclusion. Results: We included 4 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies, and 1 finite-element study from 2437 identified publications. Studies (n = 3) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to distinguish asymptomatic people from patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome consistently observed alpha angle thresholds between 57 degrees and 60 degrees. A 60 degrees threshold was also found to best discriminate between hips with and without cam morphology in a large cohort study based on a bimodal distribution of the alpha angle. Studies (n = 8) using the upper limit of the 95% reference interval as threshold proposed a wide overall threshold range between 58 degrees and 93 degrees. When stratified by sex, thresholds between 63 degrees and 93 degrees in male patients and between 58 degrees and 94 degrees in female patients were reported. Conclusion: Based on the available evidence, mostly based on studies using ROC curve analysis, an alpha angle threshold of >= 60 degrees is currently the most appropriate to classify cam morphology. Further research is required to fully validate this threshold.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available