4.7 Article

Gut Microbiota Abrogates Anti-α-Gal IgA Response in Lungs and Protects against Experimental Aspergillus Infection in Poultry

Journal

VACCINES
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8020285

Keywords

alpha-Gal; microbiota; aspergillosis; Aspergillus fumigatus; granulomas; cross-protective immunity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Naturally occurring human antibodies (Abs) of the isotypes IgM and IgG and reactive to the galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose (alpha-Gal) epitope are associated with protection against infectious diseases, caused by pathogens expressing the glycan. Gut microbiota bacteria expressing alpha-Gal regulate the immune response to this glycan in animals lacking endogenous alpha-Gal. Here, we asked whether the production of anti-alpha-Gal Abs in response to microbiota stimulation in birds, confers protection against infection by Aspergillus fumigatus, a major fungal pathogen that expresses alpha-Gal in its surface. We demonstrated that the oral administration of Escherichia coli O86:B7 strain, a bacterium with high alpha-Gal content, reduces the occurrence of granulomas in lungs and protects turkeys from developing acute aspergillosis. Surprisingly, the protective effect of E. coli O86:B7 was not associated with an increase in circulating anti-alpha-Gal IgY levels, but with a striking reduction of anti-alpha-Gal IgA in the lungs of infected turkeys. Subcutaneous immunization against alpha-Gal did not induce a significant reduction of lung anti-alpha-Gal IgA and failed to protect against an infectious challenge with A. fumigatus. Oral administration of E. coli O86:B7 was not associated with the upregulation of lung cytokines upon A. fumigatus infection. We concluded that the oral administration of bacteria expressing high levels of alpha-Gal decreases the levels of lung anti-alpha-Gal IgA, which are mediators of inflammation and lung damage during acute aspergillosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available