4.6 Review

Predicting Peritoneal Dissemination of Gastric Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine: Molecular Characterization and Biomarkers

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082236

Keywords

gastric cancer; peritoneal dissemination; diffuse type gastric cancer; molecular classification; biomarker

Categories

Funding

  1. Key Research and Development Program of the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2018C03022]
  2. National Health and Family Planning Commission Research Fund& Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Major Science and Technology Plan Project [KWJ-ZJ-1802]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81803107]
  4. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ18H160002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of worldwide cancer-related death. Being a highly heterogeneous disease, the current treatment of GC has been suboptimal due to the lack of subtype-dependent therapies. Peritoneal dissemination (PD) is a common pattern of GC metastasis associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, it is urgently necessary to identify patients at high risk of PD. PD is found to be associated with Lauren diffuse type GC. Molecular profiling of GC, especially diffuse type GC, has been utilized to identify molecular alterations and has given rise to various molecular classifications, shedding light on the underlying mechanism of PD and enabling identification of patients at higher PD risk. In addition, a series of diagnositc and prognostic biomarkers of PD from serum, peritoneal lavages and primary GCs have been reported. This comprehensive review summarizes findings on the multi-omic characteristics of diffuse type GC, the clinical significance of updating molecular classifications of GC in association with PD risk and research advances in PD-associated biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available