4.6 Article

Brain microRNAs among social and solitary bees

Journal

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
Volume 7, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.200517

Keywords

gene regulation; small non-coding RNA; microRNA targets; eusociality; lineage-specific

Funding

  1. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2018-67014-27542]
  2. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University [1297, 9239]
  3. U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation [BSF 2012807]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [PP00P3_170664]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evolutionary transitions to a social lifestyle in insects are associated with lineage-specific changes in gene expression, but the key nodes that drive these regulatory changes are unknown. We examined the relationship between social organization and lineage-specific microRNAs (miRNAs). Genome scans across 12 bee species showed that miRNA copy-number is mostly conserved and not associated with sociality. However, deep sequencing of small RNAs in six bee species revealed a substantial proportion (20-35%) of detected miRNAs had lineage-specific expression in the brain, 24-72% of which did not have homologues in other species. Lineage-specific miRNAs disproportionately target lineage-specific genes, and have lower expression levels than shared miRNAs. The predicted targets of lineage-specific miRNAs are not enriched for genes with caste-biased expression or genes under positive selection in social species. Together, these results suggest that novel miRNAs may coevolve with novel genes, and thus contribute to lineage-specific patterns of evolution in bees, but do not appear to have significant influence on social evolution. Our analyses also support the hypothesis that many new miRNAs are purged by selection due to deleterious effects on mRNA targets, and suggest genome structure is not as influential in regulating bee miRNA evolution as has been shown for mammalian miRNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available